MENA Home
The relationship between Saudi Arabia and the United States is a complex interplay of energy politics, security arrangements, and mutual, albeit sometimes divergent, geopolitical interests. This multifaceted alliance has been a cornerstone of the Middle East’s political landscape since its inception and has significant implications for regional dynamics and global energy markets.
The Petrodollar System
At the heart of the Saudi-U.S. relationship lies the petrodollar system, which originated in the 1970s when the Nixon administration negotiated with Saudi Arabia to standardize oil sales in U.S. dollars. In exchange, the U.S. offered military protection and support. This agreement effectively linked the U.S. dollar to oil, the world’s most traded commodity, and reinforced the dollar’s status as the global reserve currency.
The arrangement benefits both parties: it ensures a steady demand for U.S. dollars worldwide and provides a continuous market for U.S. debt securities, while Saudi Arabia enjoys the security guarantee of the world’s most powerful military, ensuring the kingdom’s stability in a volatile region. Moreover, the inflow of U.S. dollars has allowed Saudi Arabia to accumulate significant foreign reserves, which it often reinvests into U.S. assets, further intertwining the economies of the two nations.
Military Relationship
The military relationship between Saudi Arabia and the U.S. is another pillar of their strategic partnership. The United States is Saudi Arabia’s primary source of arms and security assurance. This military cooperation includes not just sales of advanced weaponry but also training, joint exercises, and intelligence sharing. The U.S. has a vested interest in helping to maintain the kingdom’s stability, given its strategic location and oil resources.
Regional Politics and Anti-American Sentiment
This close relationship, however, is not without its controversies and has ramifications for regional politics. Many in the Middle East view the U.S.-Saudi alliance as a transactional arrangement that prioritizes stability and oil over democratic values and human rights. The perception that the U.S. supports autocratic regimes for its own benefit has fueled anti-American sentiment in the region. This sentiment was particularly exacerbated by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, which was seen by many as a move to control more of the region’s oil reserves.
Furthermore, the security umbrella that the U.S. provides to Saudi Arabia allows the kingdom to pursue aggressive foreign policies, such as the intervention in Yemen, with less concern for immediate reprisals. Critics argue that such actions contribute to regional instability and humanitarian crises, which can, in turn, serve as breeding grounds for terrorism.
Terrorism
The paradox of the U.S.-Saudi relationship is perhaps most evident in the context of terrorism. Fifteen of the nineteen hijackers involved in the September 11 attacks were Saudi nationals, and for years, elements within Saudi Arabia have been accused of financing extremist ideologies. Although the Saudi government has been a partner in counterterrorism efforts, the spread of Wahhabism — a strict interpretation of Sunni Islam promoted by Saudi Arabia — has been linked to extremist groups.
The support for such an ideology, sometimes traced back to Saudi sources, combined with the presence of U.S. military forces in Islamic holy lands, has been a major grievance cited by terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda. These groups exploit the U.S.-Saudi relationship to recruit members and justify attacks, not just against Western targets but also against Saudi Arabia itself, which they see as betraying Islamic principles through its alliance with the U.S.
Conclusion
The relationship between Saudi Arabia and the United States, shaped significantly by the petrodollar and a strong military alliance, is a fundamental aspect of both countries’ foreign policies. While it has brought stability and economic benefits to both parties, it has also led to regional complexities and anti-American sentiments that sometimes manifest in violent extremism. As global energy dynamics evolve and as both countries reassess their strategic interests, the future of this partnership may face new challenges and demands for change.
